🎫 Hp Gpu Adreno 530

Fullcompare data of benchmarks Adreno 530 @ 510MHz vs Adreno 530 @ 650MHz GPU, which GPU is best for gaming and speed test performance compare, specs difference. Detailed compare data of Adreno 530 @ 510MHz vs Adreno 530 @ 650MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the GPU Qualcomm Adreno™ 540; Change OS/API/Etc. Android . OpenGL . Qualcomm Adreno™ 540 . Android Android . OpenGL . Qualcomm Adreno™ 530 . Android . Vulkan . Qualcomm Adreno™ 530. Add another device. Please sign in to compare more devices! Car Chase Onscreen 1417 Frames (24.0 Fps) Offscreen 1428 Frames (24.2 Fps) Onscreen 1149 Frames Dalamhal ini, Mali sama seperti Adreno Mali-G71 MP8 compare Adreno 640 vs gtx 1050 Adreno 640 vs gtx 1050 Mediatek MT8735 remove from comparison 【mali gpu】資訊整理 & mali g71 vs adreno 530相關消息 Qualcomm Adreno 530 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20,Qualcomm Adreno 530 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20 - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons 【mali gpu】資訊整理 & mali g71 vs adreno 530相關消息 stop!!! 1.biasakan baca page 1 dengan teliti sebelum bertanya 2.gunakan ctrl-f untuk search keyword pertanyaan anda bukan tempat absen, oot boleh, tp jgn keseringan 4.tidak melayani pertanyaan via pm/vm, maksimalkan tret ini untuk mendapat bantuan, diskusi dan belajar 5.junker, bot, jualan, iklan, flamer, absen, ninggalin jejak, ijin bookmark, idiot, hit n run dsb = bata (ga pake w Thelist includes new upcoming processors using Adreno 530 at 510MHz GPU which operating with graphical data with a performance of 407 GFlops. Processors from the continuously modernized list are installed in phones and tablets a various price range from the cheapest for a budgetary price to the pricey. purposeGPU). • Adreno 530 GPGPU is programmable with Android Renderscript and OpenCL compute APIs, and supported by Qualcomm™ Snapdragon Symphony System Manager. • Adreno 530 supports advanced rendering, compositing and compression techniques, with up to 40% less power consumption when compared to Snapdragon 810. • New embedded GPU power manager provides GPUAdreno 530 memiliki sebuah fitur baru Spectra ISP yang akan hadir bersama CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. Fitur ini akan membuat kualitas gambar lebih baik dari sebelumnya. ISP bisa mengatur 3 sensor kamera untuk bekerja secara bersamaan dengan resolusi maksimal 25 megapixel dan perekaman video 30 fps di resolusi maksimal. Specificationsof the Qualcomm Adreno 530 graphics card dedicated to the smartphone sector, it has 2 execution units, with 256 shading units, its maximum frequency is 0.7GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms. Therange of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) is just 3.25%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions. Weaknesses . PowerVR GE8320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530PowerVR GE8320 ► remove from comparisonThe PowerVR GE8320 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs GE8xx0 and supports OpenGL ES OpenCL Android NN HAL API and Vulkan Adreno 530 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboMediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHzMediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHzMediatek MT87688 x 1500 MHz? MHz650 MHz» show 6 moremin. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHzCPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? - 650 MHz624 - 680 MHzBenchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 6785 avg 11520 median 11994 1% max 13939 Points min 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 6867 avg 7128 median 7128 1% max 7389 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 494 avg 802 median 810 4% max 1214 Points min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 445 avg 747 median 764 2% max 871 Points min 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 302 avg median 493 3% max 1166 Points min 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 253 avg median 0% max 516 Points min 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedGFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min 18 avg median 26 1% max 31 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min 13 avg median 20 0% max 23 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 17 5% max 20 fps min 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 10 1% max 12 fps min 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps GFXBench - GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps min avg median 7 1% max 12 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max fps min 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min avg median 13 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg 3 median 0% max fps min 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPUmin 15496 avg 15903 median 15557 2% max 16655 Points Basemark X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points Basemark GPU - Basemark GPU Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 2578 avg 8110 median 8% max 13202 Points min 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 575 avg 1986 median 3% max 3544 Points min 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming IndexPower Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *min avg median 1% max Watt Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8320 → 100% n=19Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 334% n=19 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 100% PowerVR GE832042 fps high ultra low 100% PowerVR GE832048 fps high ultra high 100% PowerVR GE8320 ~ 29 fps low 100% PowerVR GE8320222424252525252525 ~ 24 fps med. 100% PowerVR GE8320222324252525252525 ~ 24 fps high PowerVR GE83200 !0 ! ~ 0 fps ultra low 100% PowerVR GE832030313156 ~ 37 fps ultra 100% PowerVR GE832029303143 ~ 33 fps low 100% PowerVR GE83204758 ~ 53 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832057 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832030 fps 143% Adreno 5300 !30303030565859596060 ~ 43 fps low Adreno 5302929303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832030 fps 97% Adreno 5300 !29292930303030303030303048 ~ 29 fps low 100% PowerVR GE832010192728 ~ 21 fps high 100% PowerVR GE8320122224 ~ 19 fps low high 100% PowerVR GE8320242426 ~ 25 fps 172% Adreno 5303551 ~ 43 fps Average Gaming PowerVR GE8320 → 100%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 137%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 158%For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0633520 checking url part for id 9411 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 9411 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 19 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 21 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 22 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 24 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Qualcomm Adreno 530 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 530 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding Adreno 610 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets mostly Android based. It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software. In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612 The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan according to Wikipedia, OpenGL ES OpenCL and DirectX 11 FL 11_1.CPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? MHz624 - 653 MHzCPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz» show 2 moremin. - max.? MHz? - 653 MHzBenchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points min 15403 avg 22761 median 3% max 25351 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points min 1414 avg 1858 median 1819 10% max 2190 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points min 1295 avg 1743 median 1737 4% max 2096 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points min 849 avg 1183 median 1153 7% max 1558 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points min 727 avg 1036 median 1025 1% max 1436 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimitedmin 205 avg median 426 0% max 634 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimitedmin 101 avg median 122 0% max 141 Points GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610 min 29 avg 37 median 35 1% max 52 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610 min 24 avg median 36 0% max 45 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps min 15 avg median 20 5% max 34 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps min 14 avg median 19 1% max 24 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max 12 fps min avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 1% max 11 fps min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps min avg median 1% max 17 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 13 0% max 20 fps min avg median 0% max 14 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps min avg median 0% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 1% max fps Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPUmin 23743 avg 37839 median 38308 5% max 46215 Points Basemark X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points Basemark GPU - Basemark GPU Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080min avg median 0% max fps PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points min 7370 avg 16213 median 17873 18% max 21734 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points min 1595 avg 12281 median 13408 24% max 20711 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming IndexPower Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *min avg median 3 1% max Watt Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 100% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 99% n=17 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low Adreno 610606060606060 ~ 60 fps high Adreno 61056596060 ~ 59 fps high Adreno 61030303038445053545757595960606087 ~ 52 fps low Adreno 610303030303030303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps med. high low Adreno 61030303060 ~ 38 fps ultra Adreno 61030303060 ~ 38 fps high 100% Adreno 5300 !30303030565859596060 ~ 43 fps 144% Adreno 610606066 ~ 62 fps low 100% Adreno 5302929303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps high 100% Adreno 5300 !29292930303030303030303048 ~ 29 fps low Adreno 6102020242630 ~ 24 fps high Adreno 610111215172223 ~ 17 fps low high 100% Adreno 5303551 ~ 43 fps Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 100%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 144%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 144%For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0633510 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 9921 + ... 11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 16 Got 136 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 18 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 19 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 21 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 The Radeon 530 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. According to AMD, there are several different versions with 384 or 320 shader units and DDR3 or GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. However, they are not based on one of the newer RX series Polaris chips, but most likely using the same architecture as the Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 shader units, 28 nm GCN and M430 / M330 / M230 320 shader units, 28 nm Sun GCN. AMD claims that the clock speed of the Radeon 530 can reach 1,024 MHz. Considering the above, the game performance of the Radeon 530 should fall between the Radeon R7 M440 320 shader units, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 shader units, DDR3 and Radeon R7 M445 320 shader units, GDDR5 see these pages for detailed gaming benchmarks. Graphically intensive games such as Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly on this GPU. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 with a fast CPU, or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previously linked cards. According to the specs, the DDR3 version could be slower than the Radeon 520, that is specified with 320 shaders and 500 SeriesRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArchitectureGCNPipelines384 - unifiedCore Speed1024 MHzMemory Speed2250 MHzMemory Bus Width64 BitMemory TypeDDR3, GDDR5Max. Amount of Memory2048 MBShared MemorynoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmFeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanDate of Link to Manufacturer Page Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points 3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points 3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points 3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 points Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 points Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

hp gpu adreno 530